revise .rbc storage policy
Reported by Evan Phoenix | June 5th, 2008 @ 03:21 PM | in 1.0
Currently we put .rbc along side .rb files. We should consider whether thats necessary.
Comments and changes to this ticket
-
Ryan Davis June 23rd, 2008 @ 04:14 PM
unless we make parsing slower (a distinct possibility over the next N months) .rbc files seem unnecessary to all who aren't building up .rba files.
-
Ryan Davis June 23rd, 2008 @ 04:28 PM
- → Assigned user changed from to Evan Phoenix
-
Evan Phoenix June 26th, 2008 @ 10:47 AM
- → Tag cleared.
Incorrect. Compiler, not parsing, is the slow part. If we think that compiling is fast enough, we could stop generating .rbc files.
Please Login or create a free account to add a new comment.
You can update this ticket by sending an email to from your email client. (help)
Create your profile
Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile »
